↓ Skip to main content

Sensory Evaluation of Skincare Cosmetics with Onomatopoeia and Exclamation

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Sensory Evaluation, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory Evaluation of Skincare Cosmetics with Onomatopoeia and Exclamation
Published in
Japanese Journal of Sensory Evaluation, January 2001
DOI 10.9763/jjsse.5.112
Authors

Yuko TAKEMOTO, Masami SENOO, Hideo JINGU

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 33%
Psychology 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Sensory Evaluation
#14
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,820
of 117,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Sensory Evaluation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them