↓ Skip to main content

Cell cycle regulation in the course of nodule organogenesis in Medicago

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cell cycle regulation in the course of nodule organogenesis in Medicago
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1006405029600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrice Foucher, Eva Kondorosi

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms of de novo meristem formation, cell differentiation and the integration of the cell cycle machinery into appropriate stages of the developmental programmes are still largely unknown in plants. Legume root nodules, which house nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, are unique plant organs and their development may serve as a model for organogenetic processes in plants. Nodules form and are essential for the plant only under limitation of combined nitrogen in the soil. Moreover, their development is triggered by external mitogenic signals produced by their symbiotic partners, the rhizobia. These signals, the lipochitooligosaccharide Nod factors, act as host-specific morphogens and induce the re-entry of root cortical cells into mitotic cycles. Maintenance of cell division activity leads to the formation of a persistent nodule meristem from which cells exit continuously and enter the nodule differentiation programme, involving multiple cycles of endoreduplication and enlargement of nuclear and cell volumes. While the small diploid 2C cells remain uninfected, the large polyploid cells can be invaded and, after completing the differentiation programme, host the nitrogen-fixing bacteroids. This review summarizes the present knowledge on cell cycle reactivation and meristem formation in response to Nod factors and reports on a novel plant cell cycle regulator that can switch mitotic cycles to differentiation programmes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 20%
Engineering 4 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#1,017
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,801
of 38,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.