↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Mechanisms in Root Nodule Development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Molecular Mechanisms in Root Nodule Development
Published in
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, June 2000
DOI 10.1007/s003440000023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Crespi, Susana Gálvez

Abstract

Under nitrogen-limiting conditions, bacteria from the family Rhizobiaceae establish a symbiosis with leguminous plants to form nitrogen-fixing root nodules. These organs require a coordinated control of the spatiotemporal expression of plant and bacterial genes during morphogenesis. Both plant and bacterial signals are involved in this regulation in the plant host. Plant genes induced during nodule development, the so-called nodulin genes, have been extensively characterized. Products of several of these genes show homologies to known regulators of signal transduction pathways in other plant or animal systems. Initial functional analysis of the molecular mechanisms implicated in nodulation have been undertaken using model legumes. Insertion mutagenesis and transgenic technologies to modify nodulin gene expression, as well as pharmacologic approaches, have been used to analyze molecular mechanisms involved in morphologic responses induced by the bacterial symbiont in the plant. G protein-mediated transduction mechanisms have been implicated, and the nin transcription factor appears to be required for early steps in nodule development. ENOD40, a gene coding for an RNA that contains only short ORFs, seems to be closely tied to nodule primordium formation. In addition, a vascular-associated Krüppel-like transcription factor and small Rab type G-proteins affect bacteroid differentiation and the function of the nitrogen-fixing zone. These initial results presage a wealth of information that will be obtained from the application of genomic approaches to legumes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#78
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,478
of 39,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them