↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of natural food for planktivorous fish in Lakes Phewa, Begnas, and Rupa in Pokhara Valley, Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Limnology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 285)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of natural food for planktivorous fish in Lakes Phewa, Begnas, and Rupa in Pokhara Valley, Nepal
Published in
Limnology, August 2000
DOI 10.1007/s102010070014
Authors

Ash Kumar Rai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Engineering 3 16%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Limnology
#30
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,800
of 38,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Limnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them