| Title |
The Tuvalu Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-011-0102-0 |
| Authors |
Adam Millard-Ball |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,699,448
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,165
of 5,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,174
of 111,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.