↓ Skip to main content

Effect of chitosan feeding on intestinal bile acid metabolism in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Effect of chitosan feeding on intestinal bile acid metabolism in rats
Published in
Lipids, May 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02537206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuhiko Fukada, Koji Kimura, Yoshikazu Ayaki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 33%
Chemistry 6 17%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 1998.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#629
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,929
of 16,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.