↓ Skip to main content

Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures
Published in
Instructional Science, January 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:truc.0000021809.10236.71
Authors

Peter Gerjets, Katharina Scheiter, Richard Catrambone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 203 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Student > Master 35 16%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Professor 14 6%
Other 61 27%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 58 26%
Psychology 39 17%
Computer Science 21 9%
Mathematics 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 52 23%
Unknown 33 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#164
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,570
of 143,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.