You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Australian nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes towards pressure injury prevention: A cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nursing Studies, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Usher, Cindy Woods, Janie Brown, Tamara Power, Jackie Lea, Marie Hutchinson, Carey Mather, Andrea Miller, Annette Saunders, Jane Mills, Lin Zhao, Karen Yates, Marie Bodak, Joanne Southern, Debra Jackson |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to assess student nurses' knowledge of and attitudes towards pressure injury prevention evidence-based guidelines. Pressure injuries are a substantial problem in many healthcare settings causing major harm to patients, and generating major economic costs for health service providers. Nurses have a crucial role in the prevention of pressure injuries across all health care settings. A multi-centered, cross-sectional study was conducted using a paper-based questionnaire with undergraduate nursing students enrolled in seven universities with campuses across five Australian states (Queensland, New South Wales, Western Australia, Victoria and Tasmania). Data were collected from nursing students using two validated instruments (Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Instrument and Attitude Toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument), to measure students' pressure injury prevention knowledge and attitudes. Students reported relatively low pressure injury prevention knowledge scores (51%), and high attitude scores (78%). Critical issues in this study were nursing students' lack of knowledge about preventative strategies to reduce the amount and duration of pressure/shear, and lower confidence in their capability to prevent pressure injury. Level of education and exposure to working in a greater number of different clinical units were significantly related to pressure injury prevention knowledge and attitude scores. The study findings highlight the need to implement a comprehensive approach to increasing Australian nursing students' pressure injury prevention and management knowledge, as well as ensuring that these students have adequate experiences in clinical units, with a high focus on pressure injury prevention to raise their personal capability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 24% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,854,194
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#431
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,778
of 450,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.