↓ Skip to main content

The Shape of Io from Galileo Limb Measurements

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Shape of Io from Galileo Limb Measurements
Published in
ICARUS, September 1998
DOI 10.1006/icar.1998.5987
Authors

P.C. Thomas, M.E. Davies, T.R. Colvin, J. Oberst, P. Schuster, G. Neukum, M.H. Carr, A. McEwen, G. Schubert, M.J.S. Belton, Galileo Imaging Team

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 45%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,516
of 5,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,005
of 31,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.