↓ Skip to main content

Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Schipfer, Carmen Albrecht, Dominic Ehrmann, Thomas Haak, Bernd Kulzer, Norbert Hermanns

Abstract

People with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy need sufficient glycaemic control to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic complications. The burden of multiple daily blood glucose self-testing can be lessened by novel diabetes technology like flash glucose monitoring systems which provide more information compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose. Despite this delivered additional information studies are showing no significant effect on HbA1c reduction, but a reduced time spent in a hypoglycaemic glucose range. We assume that users of these devices need additional education and training to integrate the delivered information into treatment decisions. Therefore, FLASH, an education and treatment programme, was developed. The programme evaluation follows herein. Patients are recruited through 40 diabetes outpatient study centres located across Germany. They will be randomly assigned to participate in the education and treatment programme (intervention group) or to obtain treatment as usual (control group). All patients have to give blood samples and to answer a bench of questionnaires during baseline assessment, at the end of the intervention, and 6 months after the end of the intervention. Physicians will be asked to declare some additional clinical data (such as details of the diabetes therapy) for every patient at every one of the three assessment points. This study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that the newly developed education and treatment programme combined with the use of a flash glucose monitoring device (intervention group) is superior to reduce HbA1c compared to the use of flash glucose monitoring alone (control group). The first results will be expected in 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03175315 . Registered on 2 May 2017.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 39 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 41 42%