↓ Skip to main content

Design system for optimum contra-rotating propellers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Marine Science and Technology, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Design system for optimum contra-rotating propellers
Published in
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf01239802
Authors

Noriyuki Sasaki, Mitsunori Murakami, Kazuo Nozawa, Shunji Soejima, Akira Shiraki, Takeshi Aono, Tomeo Fujimoto, Isao Funeno, Norio Ishii, Hiroshi Onogi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 50%
Computer Science 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Marine Science and Technology
#12
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,163
of 32,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Marine Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them