↓ Skip to main content

Spatial evolution of Hindmarsh–Rose neural network with time delays

Overview of attention for article published in Nonlinear Dynamics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Spatial evolution of Hindmarsh–Rose neural network with time delays
Published in
Nonlinear Dynamics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11071-018-4088-2
Authors

Michał Łepek, Piotr Fronczak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Other 2 17%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 25%
Engineering 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,227,345
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Nonlinear Dynamics
#180
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,892
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nonlinear Dynamics
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.