| Title |
The Roots of Carnivorous Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-004-2754-2 |
| Authors |
Wolfram Adlassnig, Marianne Peroutka, Hans Lambers, Irene K. Lichtscheidl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#879
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,919
of 58,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.