↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of catechin by Bradyrhizobium japonicum

Overview of attention for article published in Biodegradation, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Degradation of catechin by Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Published in
Biodegradation, May 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1008254812074
Authors

Waheeta Hopper, A. Mahadevan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Chemistry 6 16%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#70
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them