↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative ileus

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
65 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
488 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Postoperative ileus
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, January 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01537233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward H. Livingston, Edward P. Passaro

Abstract

Postoperative ileus follows any operation. Although worsened if the peritoneum is entered, the length and duration of surgery does not influence the severity of postoperative ileus. Inhibitory alpha 2-adrenergic reflexes with peptidergic afferents contribute to postoperative ileus. Clinically, treatment of ileus centers around symptomatic relief with nasogastric suction. Trials of adrenergic blockade combined with cholinergic stimulation have met with limited success. Prokinetic drugs have not been proved effective in the treatment of this disorder. Two types of ileus exist: postoperative and paralytic. Postoperative ileus resolves spontaneously after two to three days, and probably reflects inhibition of colonic motility. Paralytic ileus is more severe, last more than three days, and seems to represent inhibition of small bowel activity. No discrete structural changes cause postoperative ileus and the role of peptidergic neuronal systems of the enteric nervous system has not been elucidated. Possible central or humoral mechanisms have not been studied extensively. The possible direct inhibition of enteric or spinal nerves by anesthetic agents not cleared from these tissues remains to be studied. Also in need of study is the potential alteration of neurotransmitter receptor activity within the enteric nervous plexus after manipulation of the bowel.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 56%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,017,235
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#738
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,431
of 59,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.