↓ Skip to main content

Different relationships between pulse pressure and mortality in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cardiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different relationships between pulse pressure and mortality in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
Published in
International Journal of Cardiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng, Wan Ting Tay, Ulf Dahlstrom, Lina Benson, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Lars H. Lund

Abstract

In heart failure (HF), pulse pressure (PP) may reflect both vascular stiffness and left ventricular function, but its prognostic role in relation to ejection fraction (EF) is poorly understood. In the Swedish Heart Failure Registry, we investigated the association between PP and 1-year mortality in patients with HF and reduced (HFrEF, <40%), mid-range (HFmrEF, 40-49%) and preserved EF (HFpEF, ≥50%), using multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines. Among 36,770 patients discharged alive or enrolled as out-patients with 1-year follow-up (mean age 74±12years, 63% men, 56% HFrEF, 21% HFmrEF, 23% HFpEF), crude one-year mortality was 18%. Mean PP increased across EF groups: 51±16 in HFrEF, 57±18 in HFmrEF, 60±19mmHg in HFpEF. In crude regression splines, the association between PP and mortality was U-shaped in HFmrEF and HFpEF, but curvilinear with only low PP associated with mortality in HFrEF. In multivariable analyses, a significant interaction by EF group and PP was observed (pinteraction=0.015): low PP was associated with higher mortality in HFrEF (adjusted OR [1st vs. 4th quintile]=1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.67) and HFpEF (1.43, 1.14-1.81) but only by trend in HFmrEF; high PP had a trend towards higher mortality in HFmrEF (5th vs. 3rd quintile=1.30, 1.00-1.69) and HFpEF (1.25, 0.98-1.61). The association between PP and mortality in HF was influenced by EF. Low PP was independently associated with mortality in HFrEF and HFpEF and by trend in HFmrEF. High PP was independently associated with mortality by trend in HFmrEF and HFpEF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%