| Title |
Paul-Ferdinand Gachet's unpublished manuscriptOphthalmia in the Armies of Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, March 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02569046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Ravin, Pierre Amalric |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,613,813
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#71
of 464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,488
of 30,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.