↓ Skip to main content

The power of geometric duality

Overview of attention for article published in BIT Numerical Mathematics, March 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 202)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
The power of geometric duality
Published in
BIT Numerical Mathematics, March 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf01934990
Authors

Bernard Chazelle, Leo J. Guibas, D. T. Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 68%
Mathematics 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BIT Numerical Mathematics
#26
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,788
of 9,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BIT Numerical Mathematics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.