↓ Skip to main content

Identifying neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional multicenter study using highly specific criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Identifying neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional multicenter study using highly specific criteria
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8758-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Solaro, M. Cella, Alessio Signori, Vittorio Martinelli, Marta Radaelli, D. Centonze, F. Sica, M. G. Grasso, A. Clemenzi, S. Bonavita, S. Esposito, F. Patti, E. D’Amico, G. Cruccu, A. Truini, on behalf of the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the Italian Neurological Society

Abstract

Pain is a common and heterogeneous complication of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this multicenter, cross sectional study, we aimed at investigating the prevalence of pain in MS using highly specific criteria for distinguishing the different types of pain. After a structured interview, in patients with pain, clinical examination and DN4 questionnaire were used for distinguishing neuropathic and nociceptive pain. In subjects with neuropathic pain, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory was used for differentiating neuropathic pain symptoms. We enrolled 1249 participants (832 F, 417 M, mean age 33.9 years, mean disease duration 8 years, mean EDSS 3.2); based on clinical evaluation and DN4 score 429 patients (34.34%) were classified with pain (470 pain syndromes): 286 nociceptive pain syndromes and 184 neuropathic pain syndromes. Multivariate analysis showed that pain was associated with age, gender and disease severity and that neuropathic pain was distinctly associated with EDSS. Our study, providing definite information on the prevalence, characteristics and variables associated with neuropathic pain due to MS, shows that a more severe disease course is associated with a higher risk of neuropathic pain. Our findings might, therefore, provide a basis for improving the clinical management of this common MS complication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Neuroscience 13 22%
Engineering 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,245,580
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,736
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,118
of 439,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#39
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.