↓ Skip to main content

Polypharmacy in the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
Polypharmacy in the Elderly
Published in
Drugs & Aging, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11592010-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Sergi, Marina De Rui, Silvia Sarti, Enzo Manzato

Abstract

Polypharmacy is a problem of growing interest in geriatrics with the increase in drug consumption in recent years, particularly among people aged >65 years. The main reasons for polypharmacy are longer life expectancy, co-morbidity and the implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. However, polypharmacy also has important negative consequences, such as a higher risk of adverse drug reactions and a decline in medication efficacy because of reduced compliance. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has proved effective in reducing the number of prescriptions and daily drug doses for patients by facilitating discontinuation of unnecessary or inappropriate medications. CGA has also demonstrated an ability to optimize treatment by increasing the number of drugs taken in cases where under-treatment has been identified. Greater multidimensional and multidisciplinary efforts are nonetheless needed to tackle polypharmacy-related problems in frail elderly patients. CGA should help geriatrics staff identify diseases with higher priority for treatment, thereby achieving better pharmacological treatment overall in elderly patients. The patient's prognosis should also be considered in the treatment prioritization process. The most appropriate medication regimen should combine existing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with data gathered from CGA, including social and economic considerations. Furthermore, for prescriptions to remain appropriate, the elderly should periodically undergo medication review, particularly as the risk or presence of multiple co-morbidities increases. This article aims to highlight the increasing impact of polypharmacy in the elderly and to underscore the role of CGA in achieving the most appropriate pharmacological treatment in this age group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,463,388
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#606
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,086
of 191,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#153
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.