↓ Skip to main content

Anaerobiosis revisited: growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under extremely low oxygen availability

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Anaerobiosis revisited: growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under extremely low oxygen availability
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8732-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Labate Vale da Costa, Thiago Olitta Basso, Vijayendran Raghavendran, Andreas Karoly Gombert

Abstract

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae plays an important role in biotechnological applications, ranging from fuel ethanol to recombinant protein production. It is also a model organism for studies on cell physiology and genetic regulation. Its ability to grow under anaerobic conditions is of interest in many industrial applications. Unlike industrial bioreactors with their low surface area relative to volume, ensuring a complete anaerobic atmosphere during microbial cultivations in the laboratory is rather difficult. Tiny amounts of O2 that enter the system can vastly influence product yields and microbial physiology. A common procedure in the laboratory is to sparge the culture vessel with ultrapure N2 gas; together with the use of butyl rubber stoppers and norprene tubing, O2 diffusion into the system can be strongly minimized. With insights from some studies conducted in our laboratory, we explore the question 'how anaerobic is anaerobiosis?'. We briefly discuss the role of O2 in non-respiratory pathways in S. cerevisiae and provide a systematic survey of the attempts made thus far to cultivate yeast under anaerobic conditions. We conclude that very few data exist on the physiology of S. cerevisiae under anaerobiosis in the absence of the anaerobic growth factors ergosterol and unsaturated fatty acids. Anaerobicity should be treated as a relative condition since complete anaerobiosis is hardly achievable in the laboratory. Ideally, researchers should provide all the details of their anaerobic set-up, to ensure reproducibility of results among different laboratories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Engineering 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 31 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,685,096
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,162
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,931
of 445,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#64
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.