↓ Skip to main content

An enhanced genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Streptomyces clavuligerus identifies novel strain improvement strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
An enhanced genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Streptomyces clavuligerus identifies novel strain improvement strategies
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00449-018-1900-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

León Toro, Laura Pinilla, Claudio Avignone-Rossa, Rigoberto Ríos-Estepa

Abstract

In this work, we expanded and updated a genome-scale metabolic model of Streptomyces clavuligerus. The model includes 1021 genes and 1494 biochemical reactions; genome-reaction information was curated and new features related to clavam metabolism and to the biomass synthesis equation were incorporated. The model was validated using experimental data from the literature and simulations were performed to predict cellular growth and clavulanic acid biosynthesis. Flux balance analysis (FBA) showed that limiting concentrations of phosphate and an excess of ammonia accumulation are unfavorable for growth and clavulanic acid biosynthesis. The evaluation of different objective functions for FBA showed that maximization of ATP yields the best predictions for cellular behavior in continuous cultures, while the maximization of growth rate provides better predictions for batch cultures. Through gene essentiality analysis, 130 essential genes were found using a limited in silico media, while 100 essential genes were identified in amino acid-supplemented media. Finally, a strain design was carried out to identify candidate genes to be overexpressed or knocked out so as to maximize antibiotic biosynthesis. Interestingly, potential metabolic engineering targets, identified in this study, have not been tested experimentally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Chemical Engineering 8 13%
Engineering 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,326,496
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#120
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,930
of 446,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them