↓ Skip to main content

Purinergic signaling modulates the splenic inflammatory response in silver catfish naturally infected with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Purinergic signaling modulates the splenic inflammatory response in silver catfish naturally infected with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis
Published in
Parasitology Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-5795-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matheus D. Baldissera, Carine F. Souza, Bernardo Baldisserotto

Abstract

The spleen is an immune lymphatic organ linked with control of the immune response, which is important to fish health. Recent evidence has suggested the involvement of purinergic signaling in the modulation of immune and inflammatory responses through the nucleotide adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and the nucleoside adenosine (Ado), which are regulated by the enzymes nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (NTPDase), 5'-nucleotidase, and adenosine deaminase (ADA). Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether purinergic signaling can modulate the immune and inflammatory responses in the spleen of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) naturally infected with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. Splenic NTPDase and 5'-nucleotidase activities increased in infected animals compared with uninfected animals, while the splenic ADA activity decreased. These data indicate that purinergic signaling can modulate the splenic immune and inflammatory responses through the regulation of ATP and Ado levels, which are known to participate in the physiological and pathological responses as pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules, respectively. In summary, modulation of the splenic purinergic cascade has an anti-inflammatory role in reducing or preventing inflammatory damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,462,806
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#2,897
of 3,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,887
of 437,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#75
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.