| Title |
Identity tests: determination of cell line cross-contamination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10616-006-9013-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. M. Cabrera, F. Cobo, A. Nieto, J. L. Cortés, R. M. Montes, P. Catalina, A. Concha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,510,991
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#156
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,048
of 91,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.