↓ Skip to main content

Multivariate strategy for the sample selection and integration of multi-batch data in metabolomics

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Multivariate strategy for the sample selection and integration of multi-batch data in metabolomics
Published in
Metabolomics, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11306-017-1248-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Izabella Surowiec, Erik Johansson, Frida Torell, Helena Idborg, Iva Gunnarsson, Elisabet Svenungsson, Per-Johan Jakobsson, Johan Trygg

Abstract

Availability of large cohorts of samples with related metadata provides scientists with extensive material for studies. At the same time, recent development of modern high-throughput 'omics' technologies, including metabolomics, has resulted in the potential for analysis of large sample sizes. Representative subset selection becomes critical for selection of samples from bigger cohorts and their division into analytical batches. This especially holds true when relative quantification of compound levels is used. We present a multivariate strategy for representative sample selection and integration of results from multi-batch experiments in metabolomics. Multivariate characterization was applied for design of experiment based sample selection and subsequent subdivision into four analytical batches which were analyzed on different days by metabolomics profiling using gas-chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS). For each batch OPLS-DA(®) was used and its p(corr) vectors were averaged to obtain combined metabolic profile. Jackknifed standard errors were used to calculate confidence intervals for each metabolite in the average p(corr) profile. A combined, representative metabolic profile describing differences between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and controls was obtained and used for elucidation of metabolic pathways that could be disturbed in SLE. Design of experiment based representative sample selection ensured diversity and minimized bias that could be introduced at this step. Combined metabolic profile enabled unified analysis and interpretation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Chemistry 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Computer Science 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,490,822
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#906
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,019
of 317,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.