You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nectar and pollination drops: how different are they?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcp124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Nepi, Patrick von Aderkas, Rebecca Wagner, Serena Mugnaini, Andrea Coulter, Ettore Pacini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 187 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,206,678
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,468
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,399
of 124,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.