↓ Skip to main content

Salt Sensitivity of the Thermoresponsive Behavior of PNIPAAm Brushes

Overview of attention for article published in Langmuir, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Salt Sensitivity of the Thermoresponsive Behavior of PNIPAAm Brushes
Published in
Langmuir, February 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meike Koenig, Keith Brian Rodenhausen, Sebastian Rauch, Eva Bittrich, Klaus-Jochen Eichhorn, Mathias Schubert, Manfred Stamm, Petra Uhlmann

Abstract

We report investigations on the salt-sensitivity of the thermoresponsive behavior of PNIPAAm-brushes applying the quartz-crystal microbalance coupled with spectroscopic ellipsometry technique. This approach enables a detailed study of the optical and mechanical behavior of the polymer coatings. Additional conclusions can be drawn from the difference between both techniques due to a difference in the contrast mechanism of both methods. A linear shift of the phase transition temperature to lower temperatures with the addition of sodium chloride was found, similar to the behavior of free polymer chains in solution. The thermal hysteresis was found to be decreased by the addition of sodium chloride to the solution, hinting to the interaction of the ions with the amide groups of the polymer, whereby the formation of hydrogen bonds is hindered. The results of this study are of relevance to the application of PNIPAAm-brushes in biological fluids and demonstrate the additional potential of the ion-sensitivity besides the better known thermo-sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 30%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Materials Science 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,163,581
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Langmuir
#3,767
of 14,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,549
of 446,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langmuir
#37
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.