↓ Skip to main content

Circumcision with the plastibell device a long-term follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Circumcision with the plastibell device a long-term follow-up
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02550667
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. M. Sörensen, M. R. Sörensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#417
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,612
of 12,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them