↓ Skip to main content

Role of the BMK1/ERK5 signaling pathway: lessons from knockout mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Role of the BMK1/ERK5 signaling pathway: lessons from knockout mice
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00109-004-0602-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaaki Hayashi, Jiing-Dwan Lee

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades play a central role in mediating extracellular stimuli-induced intracellular signaling during cell activation. The fourth and least studied mammalian MAP kinase pathway, big MAP kinase 1 (BMK1), also known as extracellular signal regulated kinase 5 (ERK5), is activated in response to growth factors and stress. Activation of this signaling pathway has been implicated not only in physiological functions such as cell survival, proliferation and differentiation but also in pathological processes such as carcinogenesis, cardiac hypertrophy and atherosclerosis. In recent years a series of gene-targeted mice lacking components within the BMK1 cascade have been generated, which have enabled us to investigate the role of the BMK1 pathway within different tissues. Analyses of these knockout mice have led to major discoveries in the role of BMK1 signaling in angiogenesis and in cardiac development. Moreover, studies using conditional BMK1 knockout mice, which circumvent the early embryonic lethality of BMK1 knockouts, have unveiled the importance of BMK1 in endothelial survival and maintenance of vascular integrity during adulthood. Here we summarize current understanding of the function of BMK1, as well as include new data generated from a series of tissue-specific BMK1 knockout mice in an attempt to dissect the role of the BMK1 pathway in various cell types in animals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#504
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,219
of 62,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.