You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Restriction Landmark Genome Scanning
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
DNA Methylation Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1385/1-59259-182-5:053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-59259-182-4, 978-0-89603-618-5
|
| Authors |
Costello, Joseph F., Plass, Christoph, Cavenee, Webster K., Joseph F. Costello, Christoph Plass, Webster K. Cavenee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 86% |
| Psychology | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,342
of 45,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them