↓ Skip to main content

Incidence, microbiology and clinical history of peritonsillar abscesses

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence, microbiology and clinical history of peritonsillar abscesses
Published in
Infectious Diseases, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/00365540802040562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ola Sunnergren, Jonas Swanberg, Sigvard Mölstad

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and microbiology of peritonsillar abscesses (PTA) and to study the clinical history with special reference to primary care management of these patients. We performed a retrospective study of hospital records to determine the incidence of PTA in 2000-2006, and a prospective study of consecutive PTA patients to study the microbiology of PTA, the clinical history and previous management in primary care of these patients. The incidence of PTA varied between 19 and 37/100,000 per y in the y 2000-2006. In total, 89 patients were included in the prospective study (54M, 35F), with a median age of 22 y (range 13-83 y). The most frequent single bacterial agent found was group A beta- haemolytic Streptococcus (GAS), identified in 18% of throat swabs and 24% of aspirates. The majority of PTA developed within 5 d of onset of sore throat and 54% of patients presented without prior consultation for sore throat. In the studied population the patient that first presented to primary care seems to have been appropriately managed and referred.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases
#511
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,910
of 127,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases
#198
of 731 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 731 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.