↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of camelid management in Wari Empire reconstructed using multiple stable isotope analysis: evidence from Castillo de Huarmey, northern coast of Peru

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of camelid management in Wari Empire reconstructed using multiple stable isotope analysis: evidence from Castillo de Huarmey, northern coast of Peru
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12520-017-0590-6
Authors

Weronika Tomczyk, Miłosz Giersz, Arkadiusz Sołtysiak, George Kamenov, John Krigbaum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 11 34%
Social Sciences 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,503,921
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#473
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,842
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.