↓ Skip to main content

Sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: should we place the clamps at T2–T3 or T3–T4?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: should we place the clamps at T2–T3 or T3–T4?
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10286-006-0374-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Reisfeld

Abstract

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is routinely used to treat severe hyperhidrosis. It is usually performed at the T2-T3 level of the nerve, but may produce less severe compensatory hidrosis if performed at a lower level. This study evaluates the outcome of 1,274 patients who underwent endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for plamar, plantar, axillary or facial hyperhidrosis/blushing. Half of the patients were clamped at the T2-T3 level and half were clamped at the T3-T4 level. Postsurgical symptoms and side effects were assessed by interview. All of patients with palmar hyperhidrosis were cured or improved. Patients with plantar and axillary hyperhidrosis were more likely to be improved at T3-T4 level clamping. Patients with facial hyperhidrosis were more likely to be cured at T2-T3 level, but did show improvement at the T3-T4 level. Overall satisfaction was higher in the T3-T4 group. Some degree of mild compensatory sweating occurred in all patients. However, severe compensatory sweating was more common in the T2-T3 group. Around 2% of patients requested a reversal of their surgery. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is a safe and effective treatment for hyperhidrosis. Clamping at the T3-T4 level has a more successful outcome. In particular, it appears to reduce the incidence of severe compensatory hidrosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#155
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,568
of 69,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.