↓ Skip to main content

Subgrid-modelling in LES of compressible flow

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Scientific Research, Section B, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 597)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Subgrid-modelling in LES of compressible flow
Published in
Applied Scientific Research, Section B, April 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00849116
Authors

Bert Vreman, Bernard Geurts, Hans Kuerten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 38%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 20 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Professor 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 107 68%
Physics and Astronomy 13 8%
Energy 5 3%
Mathematics 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#29
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,542
of 23,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them