↓ Skip to main content

Stereotaxis and tomography a technical note

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1980
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
109 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Stereotaxis and tomography a technical note
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf01400939
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Leksell, B. Jernberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 37%
Engineering 5 14%
Physics and Astronomy 4 11%
Computer Science 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#279
of 1,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#680
of 6,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them