↓ Skip to main content

Perceived quality and citation rates of education journals

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Higher Education, June 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Perceived quality and citation rates of education journals
Published in
Research in Higher Education, June 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00974757
Authors

John C. Smart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 43%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,597,135
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#303
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,051
of 7,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them