↓ Skip to main content

Autism Spectrum Disorder in an Unselected Cohort of Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Autism Spectrum Disorder in an Unselected Cohort of Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3478-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Eijk, S. E. Mous, G. C. Dieleman, B. Dierckx, A. B. Rietman, P. F. A. de Nijs, L. W. ten Hoopen, R. van Minkelen, Y. Elgersma, C. E. Catsman-Berrevoets, R. Oostenbrink, J. S. Legerstee

Abstract

In a non-selected sample of children with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) the prevalence rate of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and predictive value of an observational (ADOS)-and questionnaire-based screening instrument were assessed. Complete data was available for 128 children. The prevalence rate for clinical ASD was 10.9%, which is clearly higher than in the general population. This prevalence rate is presumably more accurate than in previous studies that examined children with NF1 with an ASD presumption or solely based on screening instruments. The combined observational- and screening based classifications demonstrated the highest positive predictive value for DSM-IV diagnosis, highlighting the importance of using both instruments in children with NF1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,065,287
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,683
of 5,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,090
of 446,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#41
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.