You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12434 |
| Authors |
Jonas Geldmann, Lauren Coad, Megan D. Barnes, Ian D. Craigie, Stephen Woodley, Andrew Balmford, Thomas M. Brooks, Marc Hockings, Kathryn Knights, Michael B. Mascia, Louise McRae, Neil D. Burgess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 24% |
| United States | 8 | 7% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Denmark | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 65% |
| Scientists | 40 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 327 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 16% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 108 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 95 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#600,023
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#217
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,215
of 450,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.