| Title |
Transarterial Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Which Technique Is More Effective? A Systematic Review of Cohort and Randomized Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-006-0062-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Marelli, Rosa Stigliano, Christos Triantos, Marco Senzolo, Evangelos Cholongitas, Neil Davies, Jonathan Tibballs, Tim Meyer, David W. Patch, Andrew K. Burroughs |
| Abstract |
Chemoembolization (TACE) improves survival in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The optimal schedule, or whether embolization (TAE) alone gives the same survival advantage, is not known. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 65 | 26% |
| Unknown | 42 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#183
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,429
of 87,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them