↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: In Vitro-In Vivo Dose Response of Ursolic Acid, Sulforaphane, PEITC, and Curcumin in Cancer Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: In Vitro-In Vivo Dose Response of Ursolic Acid, Sulforaphane, PEITC, and Curcumin in Cancer Prevention
Published in
The AAPS Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1208/s12248-018-0190-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina N. Ramirez, Wenji Li, Chengyue Zhang, Renyi Wu, Shan Su, Chao Wang, Linbo Gao, Ran Yin, Ah-Ng Tony Kong

Abstract

The citation of the author name "Ah-Ng Tony Kong" in PubMed is not the author's preference. Instead of "Kong AT", the author prefers "Kong AN".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,108
of 1,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,805
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.