↓ Skip to main content

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management
Published in
Familial Cancer, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10689-007-9165-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry T. Lynch, Jane F. Lynch, Patrick M. Lynch, Thomas Attard

Abstract

Hereditary forms of colorectal cancer, as is the case with virtually all forms of hereditary cancer, show extensive phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity, a phenomenon discussed throughout this special issue of Familial Cancer. Clearly, the family physician, oncology specialist, genetic counselor, and cancer geneticist must know fully the complexity of hereditary cancer syndromes, their differential diagnosis, in order to establish a diagnosis, direct highly-targeted surveillance and management, and then be able to communicate effectively with the molecular geneticist so that an at-risk patient's DNA can be tested in accord with the syndrome of concern. Thus, a family with features of the Lynch syndrome will merit microsatellite instability testing, consideration for immunohistochemistry evaluation, and mismatch repair gene testing, while, in contrast, a patient with FAP will require APC testing. However, other germline mutations, yet to be identified, may be important should testing for these mutations prove to be absent and, therein, unrewarding to the patient. Nevertheless, our position is that if the patient's family history is consistent with one of these syndromes, but a mutation is not found in the family, we still recommend the same surveillance and management strategies for patients from families with an established cancer-causing germline mutation. Our purpose in this paper is to provide a concise coverage of the major hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, to discuss genetic counseling, molecular genetic evaluation, highly targeted surveillance and management, so that cancer control can be maximized for these high hereditary cancer risk patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 158 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#169
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,846
of 76,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them