| Title |
Chemiosmotic coupling in energy transduction: A logical development of biochemical knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, May 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01515993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Mitchell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,515,843
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#115
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#739
of 3,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them