↓ Skip to main content

The ligament of Treitz (the suspensory ligament of the Duodenum): anatomic and radiographic correlation

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
The ligament of Treitz (the suspensory ligament of the Duodenum): anatomic and radiographic correlation
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00261-007-9284-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seuk Ky Kim, C. D. Cho, Andrij R. Wojtowycz

Abstract

The ligament of Treitz suspends the distal duodenum but it has not been identified on abdominal CT scans. Duodenal displacement by an extrinsic mass is not an uncommon finding and is not prevented by the ligament of Treitz. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the size and strength of the ligament of Treitz in autopsy cases and then its visibility on abdominal CT scans. The ligament of Treitz was examined in 18 autopsy cases. The ligament was studied in situ and dissected for macro and micro examination. Size, shape and strength of the ligament were studied. Following the autopsy examination, upper abdominal CT scans were reviewed to identify the ligament. The Ligament of Treitz is a thin membranous and weak structure varying in size and shape. It would not be recognized on a CT image. It would not prevent displacement of the duodenum by an extrinsic mass. Illustrations of the ligament of Treitz in anatomic textbooks often represent an inaccurate picture of the true size and relationship of the ligament to adjacent structures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 22%