↓ Skip to main content

The anatomy, taphonomy, taxonomy and systematic affinity of Markuelia: Early Cambrian to Early Ordovician scalidophorans

Overview of attention for article published in Palaeontology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The anatomy, taphonomy, taxonomy and systematic affinity of Markuelia: Early Cambrian to Early Ordovician scalidophorans
Published in
Palaeontology, November 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01006.x
Authors

XI‐PING DONG, STEFAN BENGTSON, NEIL J. GOSTLING, JOHN A. CUNNINGHAM, THOMAS H. P. HARVEY, ARTEM KOUCHINSKY, ANATOLY K. VAL’KOV, JOHN E. REPETSKI, MARCO STAMPANONI, FEDERICA MARONE, PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Palaeontology
#434
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,883
of 101,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeontology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.