| Title |
The influence of acidic mine and spoil drainage on water quality in the mid-Wales area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, June 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01734297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald Fuge, Ian M. S. Laidlaw, William T. Perkins, Kerry P. Rogers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2009.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#65
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,002
of 18,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them