| Title |
Humility, Relational Spirituality, and Well-being among Religious Leaders: A Moderated Mediation Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Religion and Health, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10943-018-0580-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J. Jankowski, Steven J. Sandage, Chance A. Bell, Elizabeth G. Ruffing, Chris Adams |
| Abstract |
Prior research has demonstrated positive associations between general humility and well-being, and posited a protective effect for intellectual humility against maladjustment among religious leaders. We tested a model that extended findings on general humility to include intellectual humility among religious leaders (N = 258; M age = 42.31; 43% female; 63.7% White; 91.9% Christian affiliation). We observed a positive general humility-well-being association. Contrary to expectations, we observed risk effects for religion-specific intellectual humility. Our findings also point to the possibility that these risk effects might be attenuated by the integration of high levels of general and intellectual humility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 28% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,919,712
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#97
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,348
of 443,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.