↓ Skip to main content

Food Transfers Among Hiwi Foragers of Venezuela: Tests of Reciprocity

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Food Transfers Among Hiwi Foragers of Venezuela: Tests of Reciprocity
Published in
Human Ecology, June 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1007067919982
Authors

Michael Gurven, Kim Hill, Hillard Kaplan, Ana Hurtado, Richard Lyles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Argentina 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 27%
Researcher 28 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 10%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 25%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Psychology 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#355
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,330
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them