| Title |
Ethnobotany of WopkaiminPandanus significant Papua New Guinea plant resource
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, July 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02859007 |
| Authors |
David C. Hyndman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#272
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,529
of 8,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.