↓ Skip to main content

The origin of the isolated population of the Faroe Islands investigated using Y chromosomal markers

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The origin of the isolated population of the Faroe Islands investigated using Y chromosomal markers
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00439-004-1117-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tove H. Jorgensen, Henriette N. Buttenschön, August G. Wang, Thomas D. Als, Anders D. Børglum, Henrik Ewald

Abstract

Historical, archaeological and linguistic sources suggest that the ancestors of the present day population in the Faroe Islands may have their origin in several different regions surrounding the North Atlantic Ocean. In this study we use binary and microsatellite markers of the Y chromosome to analyse genetic diversity in the Faroese population and to compare this with the distribution of genotypes in the putative ancestral populations. Using a combination of genetic distance measures, assignment and phylogenetic analyses, we find a high degree of similarity between the Faroese Y chromosomes and the Norwegian, Swedish and Icelandic Y chromosomes but also some similarity with the Scottish and Irish Y chromosomes. Diversity measures and estimates of effective population sizes also suggest that the original gene pool of the settlers have been influenced by random genetic drift, thus complicating direct comparisons with other populations. No extensive immigration from Iceland to the Faroe Islands can be documented in the historical record. We therefore hypothesise that the high degree of Y chromosome similarity between the two populations arose because they were colonised at approximately the same time by males originating from the same regions of Scandinavia and, to a lesser extent, from the British Isles.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 5%
Netherlands 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 30%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Arts and Humanities 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,125
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.