↓ Skip to main content

Positive association between mycorrhiza and foliar endophytes in Poa bonariensis, a native grass

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Positive association between mycorrhiza and foliar endophytes in Poa bonariensis, a native grass
Published in
Mycological Progress, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11557-008-0579-8
Authors

M. Victoria Novas, Leopoldo J. Iannone, Alicia M. Godeas, Daniel Cabral

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 3 5%
United States 2 4%
China 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 68%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,411,964
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#169
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,499
of 167,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them